Parenting Around The World, Through The Eyes Of The WorldPost's Staffers

In Tokyo, a single mother who works as an editor for HuffPost Japan rises at 5 a.m. each workday to pack a lunch for her teenage son before leaving for her office an hour later.

In British Columbia, a news editor for HuffPost Canada nurses her baby, while her husband makes breakfast for their toddler.

In Madrid, a HuffPost Spain editor and father of two school-aged girls says he has "chaotic" mornings. "We have to be relatively organized so that the girls, who must be at school by 9 a.m., are not late, but we don't have a routine."

In London, a blog editor for HuffPost UK is awoken before sunrise by the "a-goooooo" calls of his 5-month-old, who is "bored stiff of being in his cot and ready to start his day." After about 15 minutes, "we buckle and bring him into the bed," his father says.

It is easy to focus on the differences between parents around the world. I write this from the U.S., where we Americans have become obsessed with mining myriad cultures for insights on better parenting. Our reading queues fill with books about how French parents supposedly raise better behaved children and Asian parents, more accomplished ones. We know that American parents are seen by the rest of the world as too indulgent and too hovering.

It was in the spirit of different styles of parenting that The WorldPost surveyed its editors and reporters worldwide. But from Europe to Asia to North America, we raise children more similarly than one might think.

There were differences, sure. At HuffPost Canada, for instance, women get a full year of maternity leave, while in France and Spain they get four months because of different parental leave laws. Grandparents are more likely to be part of the childcare plan in some countries than in others. Working hours away from the children varied, too.

But far more striking were the similarities -- the universal, human, redefining experience of being responsible for someone who depends on you entirely.

"You are no longer the center of your life," the editorial director of HuffPost Spain said in response to the question, "What has most changed about your life since you've had children?"

The UK blog editor agreed, replying, "Not much hasn't changed in some shape or form."

A blog editor for HuffPost Italy, who is the father of a 6-year-old, said: "Scheduling. Everything now needs to be organized. There is little room for improvisation."

Parents everywhere struggle with the desire to do this parenting thing well. "What does it mean to be a successful parent?" we asked. "If when a child grows up he feels he wants to make a contribution to the world, then I think the parents can consider themselves successful," mused the front page editor in Japan.

"A successful parent is one who raises a child to become a happy, healthy, independent, intelligent, empathetic and loving grown-up," said a senior editor in Canada.

Her Canadian co-worker, divorced with an 11-year-old and a 14-year-old, agreed: "To have prepared my kids adequately so that they can feel empowered and ready to take on life's challenges independently, while knowing that help is always going to be there from their parents should they need it."

We all admit to fear that we will screw it up, or that the world will do that for us. "What are your fears?" our questionnaire asked -- eliciting this response from a HuffPost France editor about her infant: "Her father is very afraid of other children, especially the boys, when she's going to be old enough to flirt with them."

From Japan: "The state of the Japanese economy."

From Spain: "That they will end up suffering, that they won't find work. That they won't be happy."

From a lifestyle editor in Canada who is still on maternity leave: "Other than the general worries about his safety (which I assume are completely normal ... right?), I worry about the state of the world in which he'll be growing up. What will further environmental deterioration mean for how much time he gets to spend outside? Will security concerns over everything from peanut allergies to terrorism mean he'll grow up in an absolute bubble?"

And we all carry some kind of guilt. When we asked, "What do you feel most guilty about as a parent, the Canadian lifestyle editor answered: "I love this question, because it speaks to the certainty that you are feeling guilty about something, it just depends on what stage the child is at." For her it was an inability to breastfeed.

For the news editor in British Columbia, it was "not having enough time to spend with" her baby and preschooler. For the Italian blog editor, it was spending too little time at home, and rarely being there for dinner.

"When I didn't know my son had a learning disability," said the editor in Japan, "I used to scold my son when he didn't do his homework and would throw a bucket of water at him ... I wanted him to get into a private junior high school, but I misunderstood him."

But despite the fear and the guilt and the responsibility, we still can't wait to see what lies ahead.

"Introducing [my son] to new things is the most excitement I get," said a father who works for HuffPost Canada. "From the first time he ever saw bubbles at about 6 months and his first concert at 18 months...to his first trip to Disney World where he bounced with Tigger and the first time he saw a vinyl record player just a few weeks ago.

"There's something immeasurably special about seeing or doing something for the very first time, and with young children that happens all the time. Seeing his tiny little mind blown is the greatest of pleasures for me."

A blog editor in France agreed: "For now, I can't wait to show him the world, the little things: play sports with him, listen to music, teach him simple stuff, show him nature, enjoy peaceful moments with him and his mother, and make sure he enjoys a life without stress, some kind of safe cocoon I guess."

And so we end our days as we began them, doing the best we can.

In Tokyo, the teenage boy gets his own dinner, because his mother won't be home from work until 11 p.m. In British Columbia, the toddler's parents give him a bath, read to him and put him to bed. In Madrid, the girls "go to bed later than they should, because we always have dinner late and, inevitably, they always play for a while after they eat." And in London, the 5-month-old "has his bath at 5.30 p.m., which is the highlight of his and his parents' day. After his bath, he is fed ... He then gets burped, gets in his [sleep sack] and (hopefully) goes down for the night. That's the plan."

Ads
NEED EXTRA CASH, click here and here for revolutionary ways to make it online.

Click here for Amazing Buzz on the Internet!

Get Paid for Your Opinions. Click here to check it out. ‎

Need Sealing Devices for pumps, compressors etc? Click here

Click here to Build Multiple Income Streams & Profitable Downlines In Several Popular Programs

Click here to refresh yourself.

Don't Bet on Coal and Oil Growth

By Kumi Naidoo
A mind-boggling sum of about $800 for each person on the planet is invested into fossil fuel companies through the global capital markets alone. That's roughly 10 percent of the total capital invested in listed companies. The amount of money invested into the 200 biggest fossil fuel companies through financial markets is estimated at 5.5 trillion dollars. This should be an impressive amount of money for anyone reading this. 

By keeping their money in coal and oil companies, investors are betting a vast amount of wealth, including the pensions and savings of millions of people, on high future demand for dirty fuels. The investment has enabled fossil fuel companies to massively raise their spending on expanding extractable reserves, with oil and gas companies alone (state-owned ones included) spending the combined GDP of Netherlands and Belgium a year, in belief that there will be demand for ever more dirty fuel.

This assumption is being challenged by recent developments, which is good news for climate but bad news for anyone who thought investing in fossil fuel industries was a safe bet. Frantic growth in coal consumption seems to be coming to an end much sooner than predicted just a few years ago, with China's aggressive clean air policies, rapidly dropping coal consumption in the U.S. and upcoming closures of many coal plants in Europe. At the same time the oil industry is also facing slowing demand growth and the financial and share performance of oil majors is disappointing for shareholders. 

Nevertheless, even faced with weakening demand prospects, outdated investment patterns are driving fossil fuel companies to waste trillions of dollars in developing reserves and infrastructure that will be stranded as the world moves beyond 20th century energy.

A good example is coal export developments. The large recent investment in coal export capacity in all key exporter countries was based on the assumption of unlimited growth of Chinese demand. When public outrage over air pollution reached a new level in 2012-2013, the Chinese leadership moved swiftly to mandate absolute reductions in coal consumption, and banned new coal-fired power plants in key economic regions. A growing chorus of financial analysts is now projecting a peak in Chinese coal demand in the near future, which seemed unimaginable just a couple of years ago. This new reality has alreadyreduced market capitalization of export focused coal companies. Even in China itself, investment in coal-fired power plants has now outpaced demand growth, leading to drops in capacity utilization.

Another example of potentially stranded assets is found in Europe, where large utilities ignoredignored the writing on the wall about EU moves to price carbon and boost renewable energy. Betting on old business models and the fossil-fuel generation, they built a massive 80 gigawatts of new fossil power generation capacity in the last 10 years, much of which is already generating losses and now risk becoming stranded assets.

Arctic oil drilling is possibly the ultimate example of fossil companies' unfounded confidence in high future demand. Any significant production and revenue is unlikely until 2030, and in the meanwhile Arctic drilling faces high and uncertain costs, extremely demanding andrisky operations, as well as the prospect of heavy regulation and liabilities when (not if) the first major blowout happens in the region. No wonder the International Energy Agency isskeptical about Arctic oil, assuming hardly any production in the next 20 years. Regardless, Shell has already burnt $5 billion of shareholders' money on their Arctic gamble.

Those investing in coal and oil have perhaps felt secure seeing the global climate negotiations proceed at a disappointing pace. However, the initial carbon crunch is being delivered by increasingly market-driven renewable energy development, and by national level clean energy and energy efficiency policies -- such as renewable energy support schemes and emission regulation in Europe, or clean air policies in the U.S. and in China. Global coal demand, and possibly even oil demand, could peak even before a strong climate treaty is agreed.

Investors often underestimate their exposure to fossil fuels, particularly indirect exposure through e.g. passively managed pension funds and sovereign debt of strongly fossil fuel dependent states. Assessing exposure, requiring fossil energy companies to disclose and reduce carbon risks, and reducing investments in sunset energy technologies will lead to profitable investment in a world that moves to cleaner and smarter energy systems.

Improving competitiveness of renewable energy, growing opposition to destructive fossil fuel projects, concerns on water shortage and the imperative of cutting global CO₂CO2 emissions all point in the same direction: Governments, companies and investors should all be planning for a world with declining fossil fuel consumption -- not only because it's the right thing to do, but also because it makes economic sense.  It is the direction the world will be moving to -- faster than many yet anticipate.

Ads
NEED EXTRA CASH, click here and here for revolutionary ways to make it online.

Click here for Amazing Buzz on the Internet!

Get Paid for Your Opinions. Click here to check it out. ‎

Need Sealing Devices for pumps, compressors etc? Click here

Click here to Build Multiple Income Streams & Profitable Downlines In Several Popular Programs

Click here to refresh yourself.

Five pressing health priorities in 2014

By Brady Dennis

As head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Thomas Frieden oversees an agency with the sprawling mission of reining in diseases in the United States and across the globe. From fighting food-borne illness outbreaks and influenza epidemics to educating people about the risks of obesity and smoking, the CDC’s work touches every corner of public health.

Given that broad range of responsibilities, we asked Frieden about what he considers the top public health priorities for 2014. Below are five areas he said deserve special attention, and why each is important. His comments have been edited for length:

1. Increasing human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccinations.

The bottom line here — this is an anti-cancer vaccine. Usually, when we introduce a new vaccine, we expect the uptake will be gradual and will increase by about 10 percent per year. HPV has stalled. We’re at 30 percent, and it didn’t increase at all last year. The country of Rwanda is at 85 percent. If we were at 85 percent, then 4,400 girls alive today would not get cervical cancer in their lifetimes. But because we’re not, they will.

2. Fighting the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, which kills an estimated 23,000 Americans each year.

We talk about the antibiotic era and the pre-antibiotic era. But if we’re not careful, we’re soon going to be in a post-antibiotic era. There are now organisms out there that are resistant, potentially, to all the drugs that we have. And they’re spreading. We need to scale up the work that we’re doing at CDC to support doctors and hospitals to have more rational and more effective strategies for treating patients, so that we can treat infections that could be fatal but don’t waste the antibiotics that we need to preserve for ourselves, our kids and grandkids.

There’s a series of things we have to do. One is, we have to track things better so we know what’s happening when, where and why. The second is to do a better job of responding when there are outbreaks. So, if we have a cluster of cases, we swoop in with the state, with the hospital, with the local in coordination and stop it. The third is to prevent it better, so we figure out how it’s spreading and prevent that in the future.

3. Reducing deaths attributable to prescription painkiller abuse and overdose.

This has been one of the very few things in health that has gotten substantially worse over the past decade. There’s no reason it has to. This is a problem that is, to a very great extent, caused by the health-care system. I believe we can do a great deal to reverse this problem through public health action and coordination with law enforcement. There’s really good, bipartisan agreement on what needs to happen. But we need to make it happen. We need to support states, support localities and reduce the risks to people by improving the management of people with chronic pain.

We want to make sure people with pain get effective treatment, but we know that all too often, the path of least resistance for a physician may be to prescribe long-acting opiates. But the risk-
benefit ratio of those opiates isn’t adequately recognized. There are a lot of risks and pretty uncertain benefits. Someone who’s got cancer and is likely not to survive the cancer — we want to absolutely make sure they get every bit of palliation they need. But that’s very different from someone who’s got back pain and comes in and asks for a prescription and may end up addicted for life.

4. Ending polio once and for all.

Polio eradication is something that CDC has been working on since 1988. We’re closer than we’ve ever been, but that last mile is always the hardest.

Fundamentally, it’s about Nigeria and Pakistan. In both countries, you have insecurity and violence. In Pakistan, you have assassination of health workers who are protecting children from paralysis. It’s almost inconceivable. In Nigeria, you have some violence in some areas; that was the big setback last year. But you also have a health system that doesn’t always reach where it’s most needed.

When we began this [effort] in 1988, there were about 1,000 kids per day who were paralyzed by polio. Last year, there were just a couple hundred. So we’ve made a lot of progress. But until we get over the finish line, every kid everywhere in the world is at risk, because polio anywhere is a risk everywhere.

5. Defending against health threats that originate elsewhere in the world.

We are all connected by the air we breathe, by the water we drink, by the food we eat. What we’re seeing is that it’s part of our self-interest to ensure that countries all over the world are better able to find, stop and prevent health risks. It will help them be safer, more productive, more stable. And it will help us protect Americans from threats that could end up making us sick or killing us.

Ten years ago, after the SARS epidemic, the Chinese government began working with the CDC and said, “We want to create something like a CDC for China.” And they did. When it came to the flu, we helped them learn how to grow the flu virus in the lab, how to do tracking to see where flu is spreading. We helped them to become a World Health Organization collaborating center for influenza. We helped them learn how to sequence the entire genome of the flu virus.

Because of that, when the H7N9 [virus] hit, they found out about it promptly, they rapidly responded and they informed the world openly about it. In fact, they posted on the Internet the genome of the H7N9 within hours of identifying it. That allowed us to make a diagnostic test so we could find out if people have flu, and to begin making a vaccine.

This is a long-winded way of saying that it was a harvest of 10 years of collaboration with the Chinese, that they were able to find this faster, stop it faster and share information faster. We need to do that with many countries and many diseases, all over the world, or we won’t be safe.

Ads
NEED EXTRA CASH, click here and here for revolutionary ways to make it online.

Click here for Amazing Buzz on the Internet!

Get Paid for Your Opinions. Click here to check it out. ‎

EARN $50 - $100 USD Daily Easy From Us.Click here

Need Sealing Devices for pumps, compressors etc? Click here

Click here to Build Multiple Income Streams & Profitable Downlines In Several Popular Programs

Click here to refresh yourself.

'If Nigeria Falls to Islamic Extremists, All of Africa Will Be at Risk'

By Joop Koopman

Bishop Hyacinth Egbebo is the administrator of the Apostolic Vicariate of Bomadi, in Nigeria's Niger Delta, in the heart of the country's oil-rich but economically-deprived south. Nigerian Christians are confronted with the growing threat of radical Islam in the form of the extremely violent anti-Christian Boko Haram sect, which was declared a terrorist organization by the U.S.

With 160 million people, Nigeria is Africa's most populous country. Just over 50 percent of the people are Christians, who form the majority in southern Nigeria; Muslims account for another 45 percent of the population, largely living in northern Nigeria. There are 30 million Catholics in the country. In 2012, close to 1,000 Christians died because of their faith in Nigeria, according to reports, and Boka Haram is responsible for the deaths of at least 700 Christians in 2013.

According to the bishop, Nigeria's well-being holds the key to fate of the African content. "If Nigeria falls to Islamic extremists," he says, "all of Africa will be at risk." Bishop Egbebo spoke with Catholic charity Aid to the Church in Need Jan. 1, 2014.

Fulani tribesman in conjunction with Boko Haram militants massacred 70 Christians late last year in northern Nigeria and there are reports practically every week of new attacks. The group is said to charge the government with not responding to Christian attacks on Muslims. Is there any validity to that claim?

Revenge killings did take place in Jos, two years ago, and in Kaduna last winter, both of which are Christian strongholds. But the bishops strongly condemned the murder of Muslims at the hand of Christians, and such revenge attacks are very few now. Archbishop Ignatius Kaigama of Jos, president of the Nigerian bishops' conference, has also called attention to what he calls Islamic propaganda -- exaggerations of the number of Muslims killed -- and he also pointed to instances where Muslims included the bodies of Christian victims among their own dead. The bishops have prevailed however, in the face of Boko Haram's effort to provoke Christians into acts of retaliation and create chaos in the country. Of course, some Christians fight back if they are attacked.

What is the appeal of radical Islam? Why this hatred of Christians?

Boko Haram wants an Islamic state in the North, imposing shariah law on everyone. Hence, everything that is an obstacle to implementing that goal becomes a target for violence. Those obstacles include the government itself, the constitution, as well as the police and the army. Christians, moreover, are associated with the West, with the values of freedom and democracy and the promotion of education. That's why Boko Haram is even attacking schools and killing children. These radicals believe that Western education should be forbidden -- anything that builds up the Christian ethos.

Then, should they succeed in the North, they would set their sights on the South. If they should overrun Nigeria, it will be a steppingstone to conquering smaller countries. There is a lot of support for Boko Haram from outside the country -- otherwise the fact that they are so professionally trained and supplied cannot be explained. If they had simply been a homegrown organization, they would have been defeated by now.

What outside forces could be behind it?

I am not sure. There was speculation that Muamar Gadaffi played a major role. He is the only figure we have been able to identify, thus far. The former president of Nigeria, General Muhammadu Buhari, at one point made a not so veiled threat that should he not be re-elected, he would make the country ungovernable. Now a man from the South, a Christian leader, Goodluck Jonathan, has been elected president of Nigeria and attacks by Islamic radicals have definitely increased. Since the killing of the electoral officers on the day the results were announced, the momentum of Boko Haram attacks has picked up sharply.

Are there enough moderate Muslims in Nigeria who could serve as a counterweight to the radicals?

Yes, prominent Muslim leaders have spoken out against Boko Haram, provoking assassination attempts. Some have already perished. There are also Muslims who are guarding Christian churches during services. By no means are all Nigerian Muslims on board with this radicalization. Particularly in the south, there are very moderate Muslims, who accept Christians within their own families.

Unfortunately, some political leaders are supportive of Boko Haram, which the government itself has acknowledged. In the wake of the presidential election of a Christian from the south, there is palpable fear in Nigeria about political power shifting to the south, threatening the privileges of Muslim elites in the North, some of whom ascended to positions of power without being qualified whatsoever -- simply because they were Muslim. Take, for example, the oil industry, whose rich bounty was until recently given to people in the North.

Yet, the oil comes from the South.

Yes, but just come and see for yourself -- we have no electricity, and there are so many potholes in our road that driving is a real hazard; plus, for the vast majority of the people here there aren't any roads at all. The wealth produced by our natural resources literally and figuratively flows north. The oil is piped northward for more than 700 miles to be refined. Within the Apostolic Vicariate of Bomadi there are no reliable schools or hospitals; there is no drinking water. Change will come very slowly. Real reform will require very courageous and charismatic leadership.

There are also reports of Christians becoming Muslims for the sake of economic advancement. Is that true?

That was certainly the case under the military regimes, when presidents came from the north and the oil wealth was mainly controlled by them in a very, say personal way. You could become a Muslim, marry a Muslim girl, and partake in the oil wealth. Those converts, once their fortune changes again, are likely to return to the Christian faith -- but doing so in the north could cost you your life. They have to relocate to the south if they really want to revert to their former Christian faith. The constitution allows for such conversions, but the law is ignored in the north.

You also have to cope with aggressive proselytizing from fundamentalist Christians.

They accuse us of worshipping the Virgin Mary; they claim lots of miracles. They often preach a Gospel of wealth -- 'if you are not rich, God has not really blessed you,' they charge. Pastors flaunt their personal wealth, and that holds appeal for people, including Catholics, who long for material possessions.

What is the greatest gift of the Church for Nigeria?

Christians have a great contribution to make by speaking truth and emphasizing the need for peace. The Nigerian bishops regularly call on the government and urge reform. Boko Haram would fade out if people had the prospects of a decent life. There is a lot of lawlessness, rampant crime. The Catholic Church also seeks to provide quality healthcare and education, as best we can. This is why quite few Muslims in high places send their children to our schools.

You have spoken about corruption as a particular plague for Nigerians.

If our government leaders had not been corrupt, Nigerians would have had a reason to live very different lives. Corruption is one of our worst evils. There is no hope to make a decent living, so many are easily drawn into a life of violence. Young people, in particular, offered very little money, are hired to fight to protect the political interest of some of those in government during elections; many young people have died as a result. That is why Nigerian bishops and priests preach against corruption at almost every Mass. We have composed a prayer against corruption which is said every day by Catholics.

What's more, young people who have responsibility of protecting the oil pipelines, are often suspected of the theft of crude oil; in some cases, they deliberately cause leakages because the government fails to pay their salaries; pipes also burst due to delays in repairing or replacing them. The spillage pollutes the water that people rely on for drinking water and hygiene.

Are you disappointed in the lack of action on the part of Western governments, even Church leaders?

The Western nations could have done more. But oil is the problem, I suppose. They are benefitting from it and they do not want to challenge those that are in power. Chevron; Shell; Ajip; all those companies are exploiting our oil and not doing enough to confront the fundamental injustice of the situation. International practice or standards are usually not maintained by these oil companies. Let me also acknowledge that the leaders of Nigeria and local communities have not helped matters as they are more interested in seeking their personal benefits rather than the general good of the community.

What is your message to the West?

Don't sit by while Nigeria disintegrates! Make sure Boko Haram is defeated. If Islam overruns Nigeria, the rest of Africa might easily fall prey to them. That would be an unimaginable humanitarian disaster. Also, please keep in mind that we have more pressing problems here than what is bothering the West, and which you tend to dump on us -- like same-sex marriage or abortion. We have been told that in order to access Western aid, we have to accept the modern way of doing things. We don't want any of that. But we are dying of lack of food, for lack of very basic things.

Don't try to impose your way of life on Africa. The West is far too interested in what it can get out of Africa -- like our oil or diamonds in the Democratic Republic of Congo -- while only giving us some paltry gifts or selling us weapons we don't need. Instead please, help us to stand on our feet and become mature enough so that we could positively contribute to life and the world in general. Africa is a gift to humanity. But Africa needs to stand up -- we are dying.

Aid to the Church in Need is an international Catholic charity under the guidance of the Holy See, providing assistance to the suffering and persecuted Church in more than 140 countries.

Ads
NEED EXTRA CASH, click here and here for revolutionary ways to make it online.


Click here for Amazing Buzz on the Internet!

Get Paid for Your Opinions. Click here to check it out. ‎

EARN $50 - $100 USD Daily Easy From Us.Click here

Need Sealing Devices for pumps, compressors etc? Click here

Click here to Build Multiple Income Streams & Profitable Downlines In Several Popular Programs

Click here to refresh yourself.

American Capital Energy & Infrastructure Commits $130M to Nigerian Power Sector

The infrastructure arm of publicly traded private equity firm American Capital has committed to invest up to $130 million in an African power project developer, Azura Power Holdings Ltd.

Through its American Capital Energy & Infrastructure subsidiary, American Capital will invest the cash to help finance Nigeria's first new power plant built under the nation's privatization plan, enacted by Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan.

"This is the first project that's coming on under this program to provide additional capacity to the new privatized electricity sector," said American Capital Energy & Infrastructure co-founder and chief executive, Paul Hanrahan.

The construction of Azura Power's planned 450 megawatt Azura-Edo power project in Edo State, Nigeria, is the first phase in the development of a roughly $1.4 billion, 1,000 megawatt power facility, Mr. Hanrahan.

With its investment, the U.S. investor will take a stake alongside Azura's initial investor, Amaya Capital Partners.

Azura has reached a power purchase agreement with the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading PLC, Nigeria's national power trading company, which was created as part of the government's plan to privatize the power industry in Nigeria.

Investors expect financing for the first phase of the power project to close in 2014 and that the plant will begin producing power by 2016 or 2017, according to a statement.

Annapolis, Md.-based American Capital Energy & Infrastructure is making the investment as part of its commitment to Power Africa, an initiative launched by President Barack Obama to support growth and development in Africa by increasing access to electrical power.

In the next four years, the power and infrastructure investment firm said it could invest as much as $800 million in sub-Saharan Africa.

Ads
NEED EXTRA CASH, click here and here for revolutionary ways to make it online.

Enjoy fast and reliable bulksms. Unlimited validity. Click here to check it out.

Click here for Amazing Buzz on the Internet!

Get Paid for Your Opinions. Click here to check it out. ‎

EARN $50 - $100 USD Daily Easy From Us.Click here

Need Sealing Devices for pumps, compressors etc? Click here

Click here to Build Multiple Income Streams & Profitable Downlines In Several Popular Programs

Click here to refresh yourself.